Based on the oral arguments, the Supreme Court appears to be leaning towards a strict reading of the law, which is limited to certain publicly traded employers womens new balance 620. For example, Justice Breyer raised a hypothetical of a small landscaping company who cut the grass one day a week for a publicly traded company, and suggested it would be ludicrous to conclude that this small company was therefore covered by Sarbanes-Oxley.
The takeaway from this case is that we should soon get important clarification on the scope of the Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower protections. If the Supreme Court chooses to read the statute broadly, the price for doing business with a publicly traded company could include coverage under Sarbanes-Oxley, and expanded compliance obligations. Although such a result is not likely, this is an important case to watch.